Panic Room

It was ok

old movie, but so good...much better than recent thrillers.

I'm reluctant to make lengthy comments on films about which hundreds of others have already posted, it seems like a waste of time, so I will just make a few observations about "Panic Room".The most important thing was that it instantly pulled me in and took me for a ride for the entire two hours. That does not happen often, particularly for a film that I was late seeing and about which I therefore had tons of preconceived notions. I was pleased with how well they established the basic premise of the film at the beginning, something that had seemed silly in the trailers was perfectly credible in the actual film. The $95 Million U.S. box office must have happened from word-of-mouth because the trailer simply does not do the film justice.There were only minor plot holes, although the lame way that Meg and her daughter initially get into the panic room almost derails the whole thing. And I still find it inconceivable that $48 Million had to be spent on what is really a very small film. Since so little of the budget ever makes it onto the screen they would have been better served with the creative incentive of a smaller budget.Nicole Kidman was originally cast to play Meg but hurt her knee and had to drop out. I don't think they lost anything by bringing in Jodie Foster, I can't imagine Kidman doing any better, Meg's kind of brainy stubborn scrapper is Foster's specialty. And she is much better from a physical casting perspective, as Kristen Stewart looks like she could actually be Foster's daughter. In fact, there were more that a few times when I momentarily got the two of them confused. This was very appropriate because "Panic Room's" heroines are not the usual film-fare mother and daughter (one strong and one weak), but rather a "like mother-like daughter" situation. I think Stewart has a great future in films (see "Speak" for a example of her ability to carry a whole feature) and it was nice that she got a chance so early in her career to work closely with Foster.I was particularly impressed with the pacing of this story and its similarity to chess masters hiding one line of attack inside another. The battle progresses much like a chess match, as pieces are lost the layout becomes less familiar and the alternatives fewer. As the two sides use up resources and get sucked in deeper, their earlier choices limit the choices that are available to them. This chess-like process holds until the very end of the film.Then again, what do I know? I'm only a child.

I'm a huge fan of David Fincher's work. To me his best movies happen to be "SE7EN", "Fight Club' and "Zodiac". And while "Panic Room" is a good flick it doesn't hold up well to post-viewing analysis.There is much that can be considered to be quite contrived. For example her daughter who goes into diabetic shock if she doesn't get her emergency injection. Or the typical scene where her ex shows up to try to rescue them. I could go on but those are two examples that remain in my mind. Even the ending is rather anticlimactic in light of what was viewed.So why watch this if the plot relies on clichés? As Fincher proved in his numerous works he is a master of setting up some very good camera shots and "impossible" camera moves. And while it's all the more obvious that he's relying upon CGI (the shot of the flashlight within the wiring conduit is a prime example of overuse) some are just simply very interesting to view. Such as the opening traveling shot which is essentially a tour of the house. The camera appears to float around from upstairs to downstairs and even pass through the handle of a coffee mug in one unbroken take and is fairly seamless until it "passes through" the floors. The opening credits deserve a quick mention as the titles are laid out among the buildings of New York and perfectly rendered in a silvery font and casting shadows across the cityscape as through they're part of the landscape. It's an attempt at style attempting to cover up the lack of substance, though. It's still neat to view.The acting is top notch from all involved. The standout is Dwight Yoakam's character who elevates the stakes as a psychotic killer who doesn't mind killing off one of his crew in cold blood. Forrest Whittaker holds his own as he tries to keep the situation from spiraling further out of control as the leader of the burglary gang. And I have no complaints about Jodie Foster's performance. It doesn't come close to her role in "Silence Of The Lambs" but it's still serviceable.But why the high rating? The three-disc special edition is something worth savoring for anyone who wants to know more about David Fincher and his crew's creative process. Much is revealed as to the use of CGI, the location shooting, sound design and much more. From top to bottom this is one of the most detailed documents of how the movie was put together. Compared to the two-disc edition of "SE7EN" this is even more detailed. The multiple feature commentaries are good but the special features spread across two additional discs are by far more in-depth. Compared to the 2-disc special editions of "Fight Club", "Zodiac" and even "Benjamin Button" I have a feeling that the need to overcompensate was mandatory for a rather average thriller.So it's an average movie just chock full of neo-noir eye candy. There are much worse "thrillers" out there so it could've been much worse. But the extensive features concerning the filmmaking process are worth viewing. Compared to the original single-disc SuperBit release it's an improvement. If you're a film geek then this is worth a purchase. Everyone else should stick with the single-disc release.

This is a great movie a must see!

This movie is about two of the many things I love: New York real estate and female empowerment. A great, gripping, suspenseful tale about a mother and daughter who find themselves taking full advantage of the title's Panic Room in order to survive a home invasion. Jodi Foster and Kristen Stewart are Oscar-worthy actresses and don't need my endorsement. I watch this when I want to feel good. And strong. Especially love the opening titles. Highly recommend.

Good classic movie. Great for spooky season.

It has some good action. Plot is kind of stupid and so is the acting.

très bien

Sehr netter Kontakt. Artikel genau wie beschrieben super original verpackt OVP noch in Folie. Absolut weiter zu empfehlen.

デビットフィンチャーの密室サスペンスの傑作です。ドキドキハラハラが続き飽きずに観れました。こうゆう緊張感ギリギリの役はジョディフォスター以外は考えられない程適役。また名優フォレストウォデカーの役も大変良かった。

Again super cool Jodie foster plays petite mum coping with teenage daughter in this taut thriller with the whole movie set within a house,worried about security she moves into a home with a you guessed it a panic room,and for the sake of a good movie she ends up having to use it,like her other movie Flight plan, Jodies chracter has to up her game and toughen up to survive three burgulars who try to overcome her.This is a tense tight movie that amazes in Jodies chracter tight escapes and stamina at staying one step ahead of the three invaders found the film quite comic in places,almost a grown up take on the home alone theme,with the three invaders being thwarted at every turn, but there are also some violent scenes,which reminds you of the reality of the situation,tense tight script ,great acting with Jodie Foster,Forest Whittaker,Jared leto,Dwight Yokam plus great camera angles ensure a great thriller.

Good plot, but ending was disappointing. Jodie Foster, however, didn't.