Product Description Empire: Total War & Napoleon: Total War - Game Of The Year Edition Includes:Two full games - Empire: Total War & Napoleon: Total WarAll downloadable content for both titlesEmpire: Total War:The Warpath Campaign ExpansionThe Elite Units Of The West PackThe Elite Units Of America PackThe Elite Units Of The East PackNapoleon: Total WarThe Peninsular Campaign ExpansionThe Coalition Battle PackComprising the award winning Empire: Total War and its dramatic sequel Napolean: Total War this Game of the Year edition covers over a century of epic wars and revolutions that shaped the world. System Requirements Minimum specifications:Processor: 2 GHz Intel Dual Core processor / 2.6 GHz Intel Single Core processor, or AMD equivalent (with SSE2)RAM: 1GB RAM (XP), 2GB RAM (Vista / Windows7)Video card: 256 MB DirectX 9.0c compatible card (shader model 3)Screen Resolution: 1024x768 minimumHD: 32GB free hard disk spaceRecommended specifications:Processor: 2nd Generation Intel Core i5 processor (or greater), or AMD equivalentRAM: 2GB RAM (XP), 4GB RAM (Vista / Windows7)Video card: AMD Radeon HD 5000 and 6000 series graphics card or equivalent DirectX 11 compatible cardScreen Resolution: 1280x1024 minimumHard Drive: 32GB free hard disk space P.when('A').execute(function(A) { A.on('a:expander:toggle_description:toggle:collapse', function(data) { window.scroll(0, data.expander.$expander[0].offsetTop-100); }); }); Box Contains Game Disc See more
S**W
Its okay - but not as fun as previous TW games
Although I have loved the TW series since Shogun, I resisted buying this game due to all the bugs that other reviewers kept on reporting. However, in Agust 2010 I relented when I saw this going cheap, so got a copy. My review will be split into 2 bits - the game itself (and the manual), the bug problem & instalation/steam:THE GAME (Empire)The game itself seemed daunting at first as it had a massive map over 3 screens. The manual was absolutly dire and only gave the most basic of information - other stuff I learnt off various forums because without knowing how the mechanics work, you can't enjoy a game like this. In reality, the manual should have been beefy, espcially as its supplied as PDF on the disks as well, so theres no excuse (IMO) for not explaining everything in reasonable detail.At first I hated the game - too much going on, and knowing to little made it less of an experience. I don't get to play games that often, so was disapointed at it all, but I perservered and after a while got into it a bit more, as I started to understand things. I have now played it on and off for around 4 months and will say the following:1. Battles: Despite the size of the campaign map, the land battles lack the scope of previous TW games - in virtually all my battles, they have been fought on flat ground only. They have buildings which you can use, but don't (but its quite cool looking at your men inside, busting out the windows ready to shoot - but I did this once in 100 years!). Gone are the mountains that were seen in other TW games (as much as a pain as they were), even the bridges, that are on the map, end up like a swamp type battlefield and everyone liked the mass slaughter at the bridges!!!That said, the battles are decent for what you get - most of the units you don't really need (you mostly just use line infantry) and the opponents are pretty weak unless you set to 'very hard' (recommended). There seems to be a bit more AI thinking in the battles, which is an improvement - but its not very strategic - the enemy will still walk into gun fire and get slaughtered etc. Seiges are a thing of the past really as well, as they all take place in 'star forts' which are ALL the same.2. Graphics: I have a 5600 dual core (on XP) and I only get mediocre graphics - they are okay, but its a shame probibly only 1 in 10,000 will see the game in its full glory. Still, it plays fine without lags with the settings right!3.Campaign Map: This vast and pretty decent. The new system of towns takes a bit of getting use to but its okay and the diplomacy is definatly improved.4. Sea Battles - After a bit of practice these seem okay UNTIL you get big fleets fighting it out - 5 to 6 ships and its easy to micromanage it, but after that its gets a lot more difficult - still its okay!5. Loading times - These are loooooooong - and TBH a pain in the backside!INSTALLATIONHaving read many of the previous reviews I knew what I was getting into with steam, the download bit etc and TBH it was pretty painless. I installed from the DVD's, connected to steam, let it do its download thing, then played it. It has only crashed once so far, so I presume the download sorted out certain bugs (It now automatically turns the sound off when you speed things up, which was a COD bug - which is a shame really, as even at fast speed, the battle sounds should be heard as in previous games). I would have prefered not to use steam, or at least have the option, but it did update well (though a patch downloaded could have done the same). Occassionaly I get a message from steam saying I can't play for some reason, but if I restart it plays fine!!! Still, Sega should take note of the users dislike of it in future releases IMO!Overall I gave it a 3/5. This is because I can't get the better graphics and the gameplay doesnt match previous TW games - but all in all, its decent enough for the money, so I can't complain.this review is for Empire only - I havnt played Napolean or the other campaigns yet, so will update review when I do.
O**H
A different type of total war
If your familiar with the total war series then I sure your familiar with the general mechanics, two armies face each other, gain themselves positions of advantage and smack nine shades from each other until one line breaks. Well that hasn't changed with Empire, but yet it is somewhat very different.Massing troops is no longer the best way to fight but spreading them out in groups and achieving the largest zone of fire wins the day. There is less emphasis on Calvary now and more on artillery and fire-power.So change is good right? Of course it is, keeping a TW series the same makes it stale and boring, however, this does not derive from the fact that I do not hold it as highly as medieval 2 or rome. Why? Well for many reasons1) The form of infantry is pretty much the same now and lacks the vast variety of the two mentioned above (unless your fighting as one of the Indians etc). You get one of three main infantry colonial which can stand very long in battle and are only good for extra firepower for main troops. Skirmishers who are good ambushers and advance screens and the line infantry who are the bread and butter of your army.... well to me its different type of ppl with guns and its like that for most factions...2) Cavarly although still very useful (against artillery mostly) are greatly downgraded and can barely charge line infantry without losing most of its ranks. This greatly reduces tactical angles.3) Your own troop ai can be pretty annoying, troops wont shoot unless the enemy is within the arc, and they wont turn and shoot ppl just behind them even if the enemy was buggering them, obviously many will argue thats the users fault but when commanding 17+ troops in a battlefield at once means you neglect some parts and suffer badly for it.4) Sometimes troops following orders are not as quick as the pace of the game, for instance if im being charged I'd ask infantry to go to mele mode, it takes an age to follow the commands sometimes.Battles are still thrilling and the game is greatly fun and with all the additions including the fantastic Napoleon game, this is well worth the money. But just not on par with Medieval 2 and Rome Anthology for me.
Trustpilot
1 month ago
4 days ago