The Unbearable Lightness of Being: The Modern Literary Classic (Harper Perennial Deluxe Editions)

Over the holidays I finished reading this book, which is one of the finest existentialist novels of all time, originally published in French and then in the author's native Czech. This is another book I am ashamed to admit I didn't get around to reading until now. In this case, seeing the movie doesn't count.The story, taking place in the Prague Spring of the Russian occupation of Czechoslovakia in 1968, tackles a lot of heavy subject matter, and the major theme, at least how I saw it, was oppression: the oppression of love, marriage, sex, family, war, religion, and the communist regime. Each of the main characters is oppressed in their own way by their own ideals, philosophies, and their own idiosyncratic view of the world. The way Kundera blends all these elements effortlessly into the lives of just a few interconnected people is sublime. Our story beings with Tomas, a Czech surgeon and intellectual. Tomas is an unrepentant womanizer. His philosophical view is that sex and love are two distinct affairs with little contradiction between them. His conquests are many, but each situation -- each woman -- has something unique to her womanhood, and that uniqueness is like a secret, one that can only be revealed during the act of sex. So by this perspective -- the devout appreciator of a woman's unique sexual identity -- his adulterous escapades have become justified explorations of humanity. He feels no love for these women; his only aim is to metaphorically dissect the essence of their being. Love he reserves for his wife, Tereza.Tereza comes to Tomas a wounded bird, a symbolic image we see later in the story. She is a gentle soul, though neurotic to the enth degree from a childhood of oppression at the hands of her mother. She perceives herself as weak. She is ashamed of her body and feels disconnected and unworthy of her own soul, so she never condemns Tomas for his infidelities, instead preferring to suffer as a martyr in silence. Tereza is a special character in this story as she is the only character where we have full access to her subconscious mind. Kundera here allows us to psychoanalyze Tereza through her dreams, which are very disturbing. Equally disturbing is the dissident photojournalism Tereza becomes preoccupied with early in her marriage: Prostitutes and Russian tanks. Again here, the oppression of her marriage juxtaposed against the oppression of the occupying regime is portrayed very skilfully by Kundera. Tereza's oppression in life manifests itself in these photos and in dreams of death, actually dreams of execution, for she is no more than a burden, a weak pitiful soul and one who Tomas feels obligated to take care of. Tereza really doesn't understand that Tomas truly loves her, and this is one of many misunderstandings Kundera opens up for discussion in the novel. The most monumental of them all being when Tomas likens the Czech Communists to Oedipus. It was an unintentional comparison, but Tomas would still suffer greatly for it at the hands of the Communist propaganda machine. During the ensuing interrogations, we get a true taste of Tomas' convictions, and in that, we the reader, can find it within our boundaries to put our faith in Tomas' love for Tereza, no matter his actions to the contrary.Then we have Sabina -- Tomas' favourite mistress -- the artistic anarchist who finds satisfaction in the act of betrayal. She has declared war on everything in her life that she considers "kitsch" including her privileged puritan ancestry and Socialists. To Tomas, Sabina is the singing, soaring bird of freedom, and Tereza, the injured crow on the verge of death. For Tomas, Sabina is the manifest expression of one's subconscious desires, which is in stark contrast to his own nature. Tomas seeks to expose in others that which he cannot express in himself, so in Sabina, he finds the self he will never truly know. This self-discovery by proxy plays out again in the interactions Tomas has later with his estranged son.Our fourth character is Franz: Sabina's lover after Tomas. Franz is a learned man, a professor and an idealist to self-destructive proportions. Sadly, Franz falls in love with Sabina, not for who she really is but for what he idealizes her to be: a romantically tragic Czech dissident. Sabina is not a liberal nor is she even one iota romantically inclined, but this doesn't stop Franz from placing her on a pedestal. How could he not? Franz's wife and daughter are social sycophants, and his life outside of Sabina disgusts him, so Sabina makes logical sense to him. He is a kind and compassionate man, but a life of books and academia, sans all visceral experience, have left him devoid of the great kindness and the great compassion he aspires to, not to mention: the great love. Shame really, and the reader can feel for Franz when the ideal comes crashing down around him. During a sexual epiphany, he feels confident that Sabina has fallen in love with him as well. He promptly confesses his indiscretions to his wife and leaves her only to find that Sabina had already made up her mind to leave him, and leave she did -- disappeared from his life in a breath. Franz takes another lover -- a homely student of his -- although he continues to pine for Sabina, and he proceeds to live as an outcast, fallen from grace until he decides on a whim for the first time in his life to actually participate in a political march from Thailand to Cambodia. Here he finds that the courage of his convictions is nothing more than fallacy. Here, the man of long wanderings will return to where he never felt he belonged. A man of delusion returns to reality.Lastly, and my personal favourite character in the entire novel: Karenin, the faithful canine companion to Tomas and Tereza. This part of the story was really heart wrenching, and I fell to tears many times over the course of the Karenin chapters. Kundera talks a lot about religion in these final pages, specifically man's dominion over beast, and he makes it clear that our translation of that proclamation is a bit misguided. The beasts were not thrown out of Eden. So, Karenin, to me, represented true freedom, purity of spirit, and the opposite of oppression. Much like Winnie the Poo, Karenin was happiness in life simplified: routine, devotion, and unconditional love without selfish motivation or personal prejudice. Tomas and Tereza both, in the end and in their own ways, come to realize Karenin's significance, as will the reader, no doubt. "Here lies Karenin." His tombstone says. "He gave birth to two rolls and a bee."One can appreciate this novel on so many levels, technically for the non-linear plotline, the various points of view represented -- political, theological, and philosophical -- and the third person omniscient narrative that is biased to the core so we can appreciate the direct interjection by the narrator who never once attempts to hide that he is the author. At the heart of it, it is an essay about the human condition, but its scope is much broader in that it dissects, much as Tomas would have, the unique effects various forms of oppression have on that condition. Kundera's passion for his characters is duly noted in one of many interjections by the author directly into the narrative. In addition to the very human story of relationships gone astray, we are allowed the privilege of experiencing that moment in Czech history where the country had lost its will and its identity. We are allowed to experience it not through the eyes of a journalist or a tourist, but through the eyes of a true witness. And that is why I love foreign translations. It's not just about different scenery. It's about a connection, and in The Unbearable Lightness of Being, readers should have no trouble making a connection, cultural or otherwise.

I found the title of the book intriguing, but was disappointed in the shallow existentialist portrayal of the characters in the book. Upon review, Milan Kandera's work tends to polarize readers into two groups that either like it or don't, I am in the latter group.

The Unbearable Lightness of Being felt a bit chauvinistic at the beginning but ultimately turned out to be an enjoyable read. The paradoxical nature of the title slowly unfolds through the evolving relationship between the two protagonists. Tomas intellectualizes intimacy to protect himself from weight. He believes in lightness, freedom without attachment, a life untethered by obligation or permanence. Teresa, on the other hand, longs for the exact opposite and quietly destabilizes Tomas simply by loving him in a way that demands presence, responsibility, and vulnerability. Ultimately, the paradox reveals itself as Teresa becomes the gravity for Tomas’s otherwise untethered and fleeting soul.“The brain appears to possess a special area which we might call poetic memory and which records everything that charms or touches us, that makes our lives beautiful. From the time he met Tereza, no woman had the right to leave the slightest impression on that part of his brain.”

An incredible piece of bittersweet art by one of the most prominent living novelists. Having said that, this particular copy on amazon is not a five star product. I had read the novel a few years back and bought this to keep in my collection. And the book certainly does not feel like a collectible item. As seen in the picture, the page lengths are uneven which is irritating when you try to sift through the book to go to a particular page. Also, because of the uneven sized pages, they get easily wrinkled. This was in fact the case when I opened the package and became quite annoyed.I know that some publishers do this type of printing with uneven pages, and I have no idea why. I just thought any bibliophile looking to buy a book should know the quality and type of the print before he spends his money on a book.

I almost gave up on this book within the first ten pages or so, such was my contempt for the philosphy and general behavior of Tomas, one of the principal characters in this story and the first one through whose eyes we see the world inhabited by all of Kundera's characters. But I carried on, buoyed by the recommendations of my girlfriend and a young man whose opinion I value. Both recommended this tale of intersection, intertwined relationships in Cold War Europe.Tomas, a surgeon, is a hedonist who believes "einmal ist keinmal," if we only have one life to live, we might as well not lived at all. Compassion is heavy and undesirable. And so he goes about the collection of sexual experiences with women, "erotic friendships," even as he lives another compartmentalized life with his Wife Tereza. He eventually concludes that sex and love are two opposing things, at least for him; the idea that Tereza might share her body with other men upsets him.Tereza, a photographer, is aware of Tomas' infidelities and suffers through them by variously ignoring them, engaging in short-lived experimentation herself, and ultimately by sharing her love with an important family pet. The author shares quite a bit of the history of Tereza with her difficult yet much loved mother. That narrative was one of my favorite parts of the book. For a time Tereza leaves Tomas. The latter follows her, invoking Beethoven's "es muss sein!" to describe his love for Tereza. This statement is a motif throughout the book, and changes in meaning. In fact, the author's frequent, wonderful digressions are one of the best parts of the book as he explores changeability in apparent sameness, beauty in weakness,Sabina, an artist, is one of Tomas' mistresses. Franz, in turn, is devoted to Sabina yet married to another person. One part of the book is devoted to "Words Misunderstood," and follows Sabina and Franz as they experience the same events and places in very different ways. Just because two people are in the same place at the same time doesn't mean they perceive things in even a remotely similar fashion. Franz is an academic and idealist for whom The Grand March, the Platonic ideal of "protest" is an elusive goal.In later parts of the book Tomas derives much of his strength during his personal and political challenges not from the "es muss sein" for love of his wife, but of his profession. Even his meeting with Tereza, he considers, was born of a series of accidents while his profession was something he chose and pursued through an act of will.In the end, though, there is a wonderful redemption story as Tereza is frank with Tomas about what he's done to her, and Tomas realizes the pain he has caused and dedicates himself finally to his bride. In bringing the moment of Tomas' final dedication to love, the author makes use of strands of the story that have been woven throught the entire course of the narrative. And in the end, I believe both achieved a "lightness of being."And I learned a few additional lessons along the way. I would have made a terrible mistake in giving up on this book so early. This collection of stories, the history as seen through the eyes of the four main characters, is told in a wonderful, human voice. When Tereza blushes in front of Tomas, it is explained that she "felt her soul rushing up to the surface [of her body] through her blood vessels and pores to show itself to him." There is much pain in the pages, much physical pleasure, and some joy. The joys that are discovered through difficulty are so much sweeter for that which has come before.

1) Plot (3 stars) - With dreary communism descending like an unwanted fog over Czechoslovakia, a man takes a mistress, then another mistress, and then that mistress takes another lover, and so on. This is more a novel of themes and characters than of any particular goal or destination the actions are building toward.2) Characters (5 stars) - Tomas it the intellectual womanizer. Tereza is the innocent villager he sweeps up--fragile, romantic, imaginative. Sabina is the mistress, confident and sexual, testing the boundaries of power and roles. Franz is Sabrina's other lover, the academic who loves the idea of revolution, and so loves Sabina because her Czech-ness represents that, even though she could care less. All these characters were unusual, all were deep, all were drawn and dissected fascinatingly.3) Theme (5 stars) - This is a story about relationships. About love and sensuality and sex and faithfulness and jealousy and betrayal and misunderstanding. It's about how we all see the world differently, yet must interact with each other. But this is also a story about invaders and the oppressed. About how you respond, and how they respond, and what that means.4) Voice (5 stars) - Kundera clinically dissects and investigates the psyches of his characters, but he is not cold and sterile in his dissections. He is warm, caring, compassionate. In this way he reminds me of a father to his grown children of characters. He knows them well, is curious about their decisions, gives them their distance, but in the end always roots for them to come out okay. This is an unusual approach towards characters and story, and I found it brilliant and engaging.5) Setting (4 stars) - Czechoslovakia in 1968 during "Prague Spring" is a fascinating time and place to stage a novel--how a city responds to a bloodless invasion, and the farce of the police state the follows.6) Overall (5 stars) - The Unbearable Lightness of Being is a beautiful piece of art, and Kundera is a philosopher poet. Not only would I recommend it, I would read it again.

Overall, I've a positive view on this book, but....there are just some stylistic aspects that just don't resonate with me. Just my own opinion - you may love it. Certainly worth your time.

When I was in Prague, I visited the intriguing Museum of Communism. There were clips of demonstrators being beaten (so much for the "Velvet Revolution") and a large group of Lenin heads from toppled statuary. What I noticed most, though, was the carefully curated plethora of truly awful Soviet Realism "art" that had been foisted on a subjugated people known for their sophisticated artistic contributions. Soviet Realism produces works strongly resembling Evangelical Christian, Mormon, and Trump Rally art, which also have authoritarian overtones. The Museum of Communism was determined to show that kitsch is an awful political and thought-control too.Kundera's novel also shows how totalitarian regimes relentlessly grind creative and nonconforming people into the ground, often at the expense of their own citizenry. Tomas, a gifted surgeon, ends up raising cows in an obscure village, rather than curing humans. That village, in turn, lost residents when the regime tore farmers away from their own beloved land and farm animals by establishing collectives that made them, in effect, underpaid agricultural factory workers.Kundera writes that in free societies with competing political factions, individuals and artists can escape the "kitsch inquisition", preserving their individuality and creative freedom."But whenever a single political movement corners power, we find ourselves in the realm of totalitarian kitsch."When I say 'totalitarian,' what I mean is that everything that infringes on kitsch must be banished for life: every display of individualism (because a deviation from the collective is a spit in the eye of the smiling brotherhood); every doubt (because anyone who starts doubting details will end by doubting life itself); all irony (because in the realm of kitsch everything must be taken quite seriously); and the mother who abandons her family or the man who prefers men to women, thereby calling into question the holy decree 'Be fruitful and multiply.'""In this light, we can regard the gulag as a septic tank used by totalitarian kitsch to dispose of its refuse."

reading a classic in palm size, very nice!

Famous story, and good to order it's kindle edition. Hopefully we will have more kindle books for us.

I enjoyed reading this book so much and truly think it’s a literary masterpiece. It took me through a full spectrum of emotions — sadness, happiness, and a mix of complex feelings that stayed with me long after I finished. The writing is rich and layered, with deep philosophical and political undertones that make it a powerful and thought-provoking read. Highly recommend to anyone who loves immersive, meaningful literature.

Uno de los mejores libros que he leído en mi vida. El libro además estaba en perfecto estado. Nuevo de trinca y una editorial muy chula. Valió la pena

Gran libro