Essays on Ayn Rand's We the Living

Rand's 1936 novel "We the Living" stands at the beginning of her fiction career and in some ways is her most surprising work. Meticulously crafted from her own experience during the terror of Soviet Russia in the 1910s and 1920s, it was her most widely-reviewed on its original issue and served notice that a major talent had arrived. Critical praise for her writing style, love scenes, and more may take aback those who are used to the unremitting attacks this author inspires. Many angles of the book are considered, and those who have enjoyed the clockwork construction Rand employs will find many of her mechanisms expressed and exposed here. Highly recommended.

This book really helped me to better understand the book "We The Living." I used it as part of my oral presentation to adults my age in a class focusing on Ayn Rand.

I read We The Living for my senior paper, and I found that having this as a reference help a lot.

Robert Mayhew, a professor of philosophy at Seton Hall University, has edited three collections of essays about Ayn Rand's novels. Prof. Mayhew is associated with The Ayn Rand Institute, which advocates Rand's philosophy (known as "Objectivism") in its most consistent, some would dogmatic, form.WE THE LIVING ("WTL"), which was published in 1936, was Rand's first novel. Set in post-revolutionary Russia, it is Rand's most autobiographical novel.This collection contains essays about the writing of WTL, background (in Rand's life and Russian history), its critical reception, its adaptation to film and stage, and philosophical issues raised by the book. The essays concerning the writing of WTL, its reception, and subsequent adaptations are all quite interesting. The philosophical essays don't break much new ground and are of lesser value.Prof. Mayhew has contributed the most interesting essay, one concerning the changes from the original 1936 edition to the revised edition in 1959. In her introduction to the revised edition, Rand acknowledged making many changes, but claimed that they were only "line-changes." She specifically denied changing the "content." Prof. Mayhew seeks to defend Rand here, but I can't say that his case is persuasive. Some of the changes seem rather important and go to the substance of the book. Prof. Mayhew's defense of Rand is a bit forced and, unless you believe in the perpetual originality of Rand, unnecessary.With a few reservations, I can recommend this book.

Most recent literary criticism cannot be read for pleasure. It's pretentious, muddle-headed, even corrupt, spouting the poisonous dogma that your mind can't see facts, all it sees is warped by "class, race, and gender." (Then how can they claim that as fact?)This book is a rare exception.It's a clear, straightforward, helpful and ultimately fascinating look at Ayn Rand's first masterpiece, written by noted scholars. Here are the partial contents:From "Airtight" to "We the Living:" The Drafts of Ayn Rand's First Novel, by Shoshana MilgramParallel Lives: Models and Inspirations for Characters in "We the Living," by Scott McConnell"We the Living" and the Rosenbaum Family Letters, by Dina Schein GarmongRussian Revolutionary Ideology and "We the Living," by John Ridpath"We the Living" '36 and '59, by Robert Mayhew"We the Living" and Victor Hugo: Ayn Rand's First Novel and the Novelist She Ranked First, by Shoshana Milgram"Red Pawn": Ayn Rand's Other Story of Soviet Russia, by Jena TrammellThe Integration of Plot and Theme in "We the Living," by Andrew BernsteinThis book provides fascinating glimpses into Ayn Rand's early development. Don't miss it!