The Lost Girls of Paris: A Novel Kindle Edition

This author has written women as silly girls who make ridiculous mistake after ridiculous mistake, all in the name of love. They give up secrets to the Nazis, not out of fear, but for a man. This book does a disservice to the incredibly brave women who gave their lives for what is right during WWII.

Gooey, sentimental prose that telegraphs the "romantic" denouments a mile away; completely improbable plotting; and sloppy research (there is, for example, no "West River" in New York City). I genuinely disliked this book, and quit reading somewhere in the middle in the firm conviction that life is too short to waste any of it reading sticky nonsense like this. The heroines of WWII deserve better.

To say this book is historical fiction is like claiming that Alice in Wonderland is about the natural habitat of rabbits. This was one of the most unrealistic books I have ever read. I read a lot. The fact that it has a good review by Glamour magazine and the author wrote for a strictly romance publisher should give you a hint. A woman is being tortured to death and she is worried about the "disgusting" lice in her hair. A boxcar of prisoners dying of heat and thirst but the heroine wets a rag to wipe the "fevered brow" of a friend who has managed to find and hide a grenade from her German captors over weeks of captivity and torture? These are but very small incidents I highlighted to amuse myself toward the end of the book that I read or slogged through only because it was assigned by my Book Club. How this came to be a best seller is a sad commentary on the reading public.

The Lost Girls of Paris by Pam Jenoff is a compelling read that transports the reader to the days just before and after the end of WW2. Those who enjoyed the Alice Network, understand the dangers of thwarting the Nazis and are in the mood for another novel emphasizing the bravery and unknown service of women trained as spies to aid the resistance movement in France during the German occupation will find this story of behind-the-scenes radio operatives both nail-biting and sad. Even as Jenoff succeeds in creating a fast-moving tale that is one part mystery and one part investigation, I found that the writer's 2018 sensibilities and modern voice often times inserted themselves where perhaps the voices of the three women and their times should have been sufficient. It seems the modern trend in this sort of literature is to depict the female character as someone on a feminist mission--someone who wouldn't think twice about leaving their jobs or family for a day to march on Washington. The women in this novel are from a different generation--their missions were bigger than personal--so much so that the concept of ME never entered into their decision making.With that said, the novel tells the story of three different women. Grace from New York during the period after the war before the Nuremburg trials were in full swing. Grace happens upon a valise in the middle of Grand Central Station on a morning when she's hanging her head in a bit of a walk of shame. After opening the bag to find a dozen photographs of young women, her curiosity is piqued, especially after she discovers that the woman who owned the bag was killed in a hit and run accident in the street just outside the station.The second voice is that of Eleanor, a woman working for the British SOE during the last years of the war. Her job was to train women operatives to go to France undercover in order to transmit detailed information about German troop movement and such to help speed up the D-Day invasion. Eleanor, an immigrant from Eastern Europe wants nothing more than to be a British citizen and help her country fight the Nazi oppression of Europe. Of course, her 'girls' are regarded as secondary to the men who were fighting the war on the ground and in the skies every day and Eleanor feels she must prove their worth to gain them the gravitas their bravery deserves.The third voice is that of Marie--one of Eleanor's girls. The reader goes through recruitment, training and eventual deployment with this feisty woman who puts everything on the line for her young daughter back in London.The story is told in an alternative chapter format where each woman is given her time in the spotlight. From Grace's perspective, the reader learns what paperwork and documents reveal and don't reveal; from Eleanor and Marie's, the story's dimension fully fleshes out to reveal the horror and disappointment of playing with danger, being caught, never finding answers and being dismissed--buried under paperwork, red tape and arson and never remembered.Jenoff makes a point of showing how war is run by governments willing to barter with individual's lives. Two minutes after the armistice is signed, these governments must define new enemies. Ironically, the Russian allies are now Cold War Soviets and the German scientists who once produced gases to promulgate genocide are now wooed to help aid in the new scientist of the atom bomb. Sad, indeed and confusing to those who lost their family members to these changing definitions.Two of the stories end happily, one does not. Nevertheless, all three women manage to achieve something personal beyond the mere discovery of what happened to Eleanor's girls. These revelations launch each woman into the second half of the 20th century with more nuanced insights.Bottom line? Even though I liked the Lost Girls of Paris, I found the storyline as well as the character motivations predictable. Of course, the women are going to forge onward dauntless to threat of torture and death--what sort of Wonder Women would we be if we opted for conventional lives? There are countless women--and men--who work toward the common good without needing to be known or remembered on the front page of a newspaper or internet site. Think back to 9-11 when as we all felt that uncertainty, we naturally and instinctually banded together to mourn and work together. I only felt that spirit in this novel once--via the character Josie--a spitfire of a girl who works as part of a team without any need for self-aggrandizement. Nevertheless, I recommend the book as a page-turning read.

This is a book purchased on Amazon.I have not finished the book yet. I am liking the story so far. There is one HUGE glaring historical error: Grace the American In 1946 goes into a diner and sees a news broadcast on television. Hardly anything or anyone had a TV in 1946! The first televised newscast was Jan. 12,1952!!!!

Thank you to all the reader reviewers who disliked this book. I thought it might be only my picky reading that found so many inaccuracies and anachronisms, but it seems I'm not alone. I've only read a fraction of the book so far and it has me cringing a lot. ' Meticulous research' ??? No way! As others have said, don't waste your money unless silly historical romances are your cup of tea.

The story had so many coincidences as to be unbelievable. Really disappointing throughout. Didn’t feel anywhere close to a real depiction of war time events

It really irritates me when American authors can’t be bothered to research properly and making glaring errors about Britain and the English language.Don’t waste your time or money on this, there are far better books about Vera Atkins and the female SOE agents. Changing names and accents does little to disguise that this is merely a copy of far more accurate and better written stories.

Others above have commented on some of the errors, I have more to add. No one used the expression "asking for the loo" in the 1940s - it only really came into common use in the 70s. Duvets did not exist in WW2 England - we had sheets and blankets, and a bedspread if we were lucky. The QE2 was launched in 1967, so hardly a honeymoon choice for Grace and Tom. Elinor could not have done research at the Public Record Office in Kew in 1946 because it only opened in 1977. What was this small "tablet" that Mark pulled from his jacket to show Marie's address in Chapter 29? I cannot believe this was more than a paper note book, surely????I'm sorry to say these things matter to me, and errors like this spoiled my enjoyment of what was probably a good read.

I’ve read other Pam Jennof books and enjoyed them, but this one was nowhere near as good.For a start we had some ludicrous plot-lines. We’re to believe that a captured member of the SOE, who was captured by the Gestapo, interrogated, imprisoned for weeks and then put on a train for a camp was still able to conceal a grenade the size of an egg! Maybe she kept it in her handbag..!! Not to mention the high ranking Nazi War Criminal who kept hold of a key to his Safety Deposit Box. I realise these were necessary to get the plot to its conclusion, but they were totally unbelievable.Whilst I’m on the subject, the author (and her publishing team) really need to brush up in their accuracy: we had a couple - in the 1940s - discussing a trip across the Atlantic on the QEII. If the author is struggling to see what’s wrong with this I’ll make it simple .... Queen Elizabeth II didn’t come to the throne until 1952, so hard to imagine a ship named after a monarch who didn’t exist at that point (the QEII wasn’t built until the 1960s). I know Ms Jennoff is American bit that’s just sloppy writing.

This book seemed to be a great easy read. It is written by a woman about women's roles in WW2.The subject matter is gritty but it is handled in a light way that should make it accessible to anyone.The story starts in New York just after the war alongside another timeline in London during 1944. Details of the settings are a major part of the book in the first few chapters and it is increasingly frustrating that many of the details are inaccurate - one example being that the author refers to a British house as being a "row house" (of course it is a terrace). I understand the author is American but an editor ought to have picked this up.After a few chapters I got the definite feeling that I had read it before. The true events behind this story are amazing and have been used as a basis for many novels so I was curious to see if Pam Jenoff could bring something new.Unfortunately the novel lightens the topic far too much adding a romantic level that is too obvious and introducing coincidences that are completely unbelievable.This might be good for someone who knows nothing of this story but The Lilac Girls and anything by Kate Quinn are far better.The characters were inconsistent to the story and the author seemed to want them to do everything for everyone.There were also some basic historical inaccuracies which is normally not a problem in fiction when the story is strong enough but it wasn't here.Some people will love the light touch of the subject but I thought the memory was trivialised and wanted something much darker.I was suspicious of the pretty "girl" on the front cover and the use of the term "girl" in the title which were all women trying to establish themselves in a male world.

With Pam Jenoff you’re guaranteed a good well researched read. And The Lost Girls of Paris, an historical fiction based on the true heroism of the Special Operations Executives of WWII, didn’t let me down. It’s so fast paced and exciting I finished it in a few days. Anything by Pam Jenoff I would give a well deserved five star rating.The book follows three women agents from different backgrounds brought together through their enrolment in the SEO. Following training they are deployed into their special operation missions across Paris. They are to be under cover operators for London in Nazi occupied Paris. That is, until their roles are jeopardised and their lives threatened when one of their operation transmitters is intercepted by the Germans.A most exciting story of heroism and strength.