CQR Men's Tactical Pants, Water Resistant Ripstop Cargo Pants, Lightweight EDC Work Hiking Pants, Outdoor Apparel

comfortable breathable good quality and fit well. pockets are all thought out and useful.

A little stiff when received but relaxed a bit after initial wash. Comfortable, attractive, lots of pockets and getting the right length is awesome.

For lightweight tactical pants, these fit my need. I wanted a pant with multiple pockets as I was planning a trip to the Southwest and needed a fabric that would be flexible enough for a 3 hour flight and light and breathable enough for 100 degrees heat. No problem! They appear durable and feel comfortable. I plan to order again in a different color. FYI - the pants are true to size. I'm a 34/30 and usually buy pants a little long to account for shrinkage. No need to buy long with these as the fit was true for me.

Pants are comfortable. Size fit was as expected. Only complaints really are the front hip pockets are maybe a little smaller than normal. I prefer pants with deeper pockets, there seem pretty shallow to me. Other than that, pretty comfortable and durable pants.

These pants have been very durable. They fit true to size, they're light weight and pretty water repellant, and they're priced well for the quality. These are the only brand I want to buy now!

These black tactical pants are hands down the best I’ve owned. The fit is perfect comfortable enough for all-day wear but still structured enough to look sharp. The fabric is tough and durable, but not stiff or restrictive. Whether I’m at the range, on a hike, or just running errands, these pants hold up like a champ. The pockets are a game-changer plenty of storage, well-placed, and actually useful. The reinforced knees and water-resistant finish are just icing on the cake. They’ve survived mud, rain, and rough terrain without a single issue.

These pants are great. Comfortable, the flexible waist is a plus and the pockets are convenient. I have two pairs of these and will keep going back to them. Durable, functional and overall a great buy. Gentlemen get yourselves a few pairs of these.

Compared to a lot of the more popular brands of cargo hiking pants I’ve tried, I like the CQR pants better. For hiking, outdoors, and utility, most pants lack enough pockets, and they look silly. The Columbia Silver Ridge has good pockets, functionality, and light-weight material, but they’re floppy and don’t look nice. The CQR Sierra pants have good functionality and they look really nice!I’ve tried the following CQR styles, and here are my first impressions:►TLP125 Tactical Duratex Mag PocketPro: I love all the pockets, and the fact that some of them zip or otherwise close to secure contents. And I like the little metal rings on the front to clip items on. They look pretty cool except for the bellbottom bagginess.Con: I don’t like that they’re so baggy and especially the bellbottom legCon: I don’t like the elastic band waistCon: The material feels heavier, not as good for travel/hiking/backpackingCon: The heavier material also seems like it will be hotter and not very quick to dry if it gets wetCon: When bending and squatting down, the pants pull down and gap open in the back, creating the “plumber reveal.” I think the elastic waistband might be contributing to this. I also think they’ll be constantly sliding down if wearing with a backpack when hiking.►TXP900 SierraPro: I like that these have a more tapered leg and slim-fit. Looks much nicer.Pro: I like the lighter weight material (compared to the TLP125), with a little stretch for ease of bending.Pro: I like the waistband and specifically that there is not an elastic band bunching as with the TLP125 (And does not pull down and gap as much on the backside when squatting down, to create the “plumber reveal,” as does the TLP125.) The Sierra waistband should also work better when backpacking, and not slide down as much.Con: I wish there were more of the pockets, including pockets that can zip and close securely as with the TLP125.►TXP901 SedonaPro: Similar to the Sierra, it has lighter weight material and little more of a slim fit than the TLP125Pro: I like that there were at least 2 zip thigh pockets.Con: I didn’t like the split/double back pockets so much. They look odd, and reduced the size of a full back pocket. So I think I prefer the Sierra.Con: While slimmer than the TLP125, it looked a little more baggy than the Sierra and the bottom of the leg flared out a little more. So I like the slim fit look of the Sierra better between the two.I wish there was a model that had the lightweight material of the Sierra, a slim fit, tapered leg, the waistband of the Sierra (no elastic bunching band like the TLP125). But that it had more of the pockets as on the TLP125.I’d like to find a model that married the best of both styles. Is there model like that?Also I’d like to know if these CQR pants have a UPF rating - I couldn’t find it in the specs, and would prefer UPF 50+.