Sociological Theory in the Contemporary Era: Text and Readings

This two volume series by editors Laura Desfor-Edles and Scott Appelrouth is the ideal choice for the sociological theory professor looking for a tight overview of the discipline's theoretical paradigms. The textbook/reader format is excellent, which should make studying a good deal easier for students. Edles and Appelrouth frame each chapter (each covering a different set of theories, like phenomenology, the Frankfurt School, feminism, pomo/poststructuralism, etc.) with extensive and clearly divided text that explains each set of theories.It's brilliantly organised. First each chapter gives a broad overview of the theoretical paradigm in question, then moves to the first theorist in the chapter, gives their biography, their intellectual influences, and a good summary of their overall theoretical orientation all under defined headings, and then their readings. Before each reading is a deft summary that should help students cram when they're pressed for time as Edles and Appelrouth distil main ideas quite well in their synopses.The structure works very well simply because it puts everything in one place. As a professor of sociology teaching theory it is often not enough to simply say "here is such and such famous work, read and enjoy!" It must be properly contextualised by understanding both the personal beliefs and background of the theorist in question, their particular historical moment, and the location of a particular reading relative to other works of theirs. To this end, this text does so in an elegant way that should be a great help to professors trying to cover a huge swathe of material. Edles and Appelrouth's framework gives each theorist the respect she or he deserves.The text is praiseworthy because the editors critically engage with each theorist in their overviews and summaries. For example, they make clear to students that certain theorists generalised from the social experiences and perspectives of white men; while this is no reason to *discount* what, say, Talcott Parsons had to say, it is so important to put that at the forefront of students' minds to ensure that they go through such research remembering that caveat. The editors also deserve a lot of credit for trying to put forward an eloquent but coherent definition of postmodernism and poststructuralism. Noting the limitations of such, they still managed to write working definitions that students can get their heads around.It's hard to find serious flaws with this work, which is broadly inclusive and runs the gamut from structural functionalism to the more syncretic theories of the latest sociological research. It also has a well done chapter on feminism and credit goes to the authors for integrating the work of such luminaries as Patricia Hill Collins and Arlie Hochschild into the sociological canon where they so rightly belong. Hochschild's "The Managed Heart" is appropriately thought provoking research and reading in the best of the modern sociological tradition.The one small complaint is that these authors, like so many of their contemporaries, are irritatingly proud of the fact that they include pictures in the book and say that this helps visual learning and is more attractive to students.No.It's also very condescending to tell students that they'll enjoy a book more if it has pretty pictures in it, or that snapshots from the Matrix will make them enjoy something more than not. I see this trend in bigger names in textbooks, like in Macionis' Sociology which is downright infested with this demeaning mentality. Visual learning is real and valuable, yes, absolutely. But visual learning does *not* mean random pictures of celebrities. In the chapter about postmodernism/poststructuralism for example a picture of Neo from the Matrix- a rather large one too- is included with the caption "The Matrix exemplifies two critical features of the postmodern world: technological surveillance and simulation." True enough. It doesn't need the bloody picture of Neo walking, however. Pictures that teach are those that exemplify that oldest of cliches "a picture is worth a thousand words." The sorts of pictures that win awards, in other words. Also in this vein, graphics and charts that bring information to life. *That* enhances visual learning.Simple photographs, less so.Beyond this one issue, however, which undercuts an otherwise highly intellectual and beautifully perspicuous sociology text, I can find precious little flaw with Sociological Theory in the Contemporary Era. I'd strongly advise social theory teachers to consider it.

As a starving college student, I really appreciated the efficiency and quality this seller stands by to make books available for students like myself. It can be difficult buying books during these times, but this seller made my life a little easier. There was a kind gesture inside the packaging as well that lifted a huge burden off of me while being a student at UCLA. I am so grateful that this book came in great condition and in a swift manner. A wonderful service offered overall.

Good

I am pleased with the condition of the Sociology book and the chapters I have read so far fulfil my requirement, it's a good read. Thank you for your efficient service Amazon. see you soon.Erwin

I needed this textbook for my Social Theory class, I loved it. It was not hard to understand, and very helpful on learning about different theorists .

Thanks!

school book

The book is in poor shape, bent and creased. It is in much worse shape than I expected it to be and it is difficult to turn some of the pages. It is just a rental for my university class; I am glad it isn't a purchase. I will get through the semester okay using it.

Product was damaged the back page was bent and the book had lots of dinks on the bottom which normally wouldn’t bother me but when u pay 150 u expect better