The Conjuring (2013) - A James Wan Film/Movie

I've been collecting very popular horror movie DVDs of late. Doing, of course, a bit of research before ordering. The best of reviews did not have any bearing on my mind when I watched these movies. However, "The Conjuring" changed everything. Right from the word "go" it had a tantalizing effect. I had read about the extremely disturbing sound effects as the high point of the movie. I started watching it at 02:00 A.M. and was forced to reduce the volume so as to not disturb my 5 year old son sound asleep nor my neighbours Nonetheless, even with reduced volume it was sufficientto keep me on the edge of my seat. Planning to watch it during day time on a holiday with the max audio on my home theatre. This one's surely got the stuff to scare the s*** out of the audience. Pre-ordering Part 2. And kudos to Amazon and their partners for their amazingly prompt service.

At last, i purchased the scariest blu ray movie of all time. I never believed in Ghost or Demon until i saw this movie in theater. From that moment, i started giving benefit of doubt. It really scare the sh*t out of me. Blu ray disc is amazing. It has two audio i.e Master HD-DTS and Dolby Digital. Of course, some exciting special features which is really creepy than movie. Overall, its really worth buying. I loved it.

If you are looking for a horror movie, this is the one you should buy. It has special features and scenes on how it was directed.The most terrifying thing about it is that it is based on a real story that happened long back. The ghost hunters depicted in the movie actually existed. I don't know whether this thing is true or not but overall this movie was worth my price. Nice service by Amazon but a little disappointed in the courier company. It lost one star because the movie is, in a way, over the top regarding the scary scenes. Same things are repeated over and over again, but it is enjoyable for horror movie fans like me.

Pretty good horror movie in a time when good horror movies were lacking . Good story, is shot well, and the effects are pretty good. ,It's worth adding to your horror collection. Thrill to watch on bluray

WITHOUT HOME THEATER THIS IS JUST STORY, IN MY HOME I AM USING YAMAHA HOME THEATER, IN THIS MOVIE SOUND IS BETTER THAN ANY OTHER HORROR MOVIE OR ACTION MOVIE, SOMETHING YOU WANT TO SCARY YOUR GIRLFRIEND OR FAMILY YOU BETTER SHOW THIS MOVIE IN YOUR HOME THEATER

Good

i watch horror movies to see whats new and what scares me and the last movie that i really enjoyed was " ECHO ",but this i can say -only one word to describe " WOW ".WATCH THIS MOVIE ...

1. Region Free Blu Ray2. Audio: 4.9 Its really great!3. Video: 4.64. Bonus features are scary too. Pretty decent bonus material.

when I initially heard of this film and primarily its association with Ed and Lorraine Warren, I had a lot of major expectations. Since I had seen them appear as guests on the Don Lane show in the late 70s, on Australian TV, they made a very strong impression; they spoke of their work more in the sense of a vocation and it was very evident that their strong and positive characters/personalities came through right to the forefront. On the show I saw them on, they played some audio tapes which may have come from the UK or may have been from the US, I don't recall, anyway these tapes were spooky, chilling, and if they ever sold them or provided them as an extra on a new version of this film of some of the documentaries about them, I would buy them at the drop of a hat. The essential point I'm trying to convey is that the character of Ed and Lorraine Go to the heart of the story in the conjuring, and I think you cannot divorce Ed and Lorraine as central and credible real-life characters without changing the story. Right from the start of the film the quality of tension underlies the entire film. James Wan makes the light and shade, as well as a couple of jokes, work immensely well for this film. Although I understand that this was scripted, it was supposed to be scripted from real-life, but thanks to the fact that there is no commentary of any kind, we simply don't know. I think it would be appropriate for the filmmakers to either get Lorraine Warren (if she wants to) do a commentary, or maybe have the writers do a joint commentary saying what is adapted real-life, and what is out and out fiction. Overall, at least from my point of view, I would classify this film as the scariest I've ever seen. I have been shut down about this, and told that MAMA, INSIDIOUS CHAPTER 2, and some other films are scarier, but given what I know about Ed and Lorraine, and that I like supernatural, ghost house type stories (however, this is so much more than just a ghost house story), I still maintain that this is a James Wan masterpiece that takes you on a tour of the dark side. When I received the DVD Blu-ray combo was happy to find that the cover was the hologram of one particular scene, and it's pretty cool. I still don't like the ultraviolet option since you have to sign up for two accounts (and they ask you for too much personal material), the file you can stream is only available for a limited time, and the so-called digital download presupposes you've passed over all the personal information before you can get the digital file. Anyway, I really wish the Studios would just can it with the UV garbage and provide a digital download. The Three extras are really great, since you get an interview with the original family, as well as the clearly terrified mother; there is also a special on Lorraine Warren, who takes her work very seriously, and the special feature is a very powerful bonus. The feature with James Wan, is a pleasure to watch, since he is obviously done his research on Ed and Lorraine, and it is clear James enjoys his work, and he knows what scares you...; Which makes his later claim, which he gave in a separate interview that I saw on the BBC, that he is leaving horror all the more devastating: there is simply no one of the caliber of James Wan that I am aware of. I for one, certainly hope he goes back on his statement that he is leaving horror, since I'll be lining up for tickets at the theater, and preorders for combo packs.***Amazon's Fulfillment services in Lexington KY is getting to be very bothersome; I had two orders thrown together in one BAG, and it looked like no care was taken with the orders at all.TAKEN 2 had the cover damaged, and the CD "NEW" had an obvious bend in the cover; only the CONJURING combo miraculously survived anything except a few minor dings; most of my orders in the last few months have been packed in the same careless manner, and some damage has been above and beyond normal shipping issues, since the el-cheapo packing is used a de-facto send method.

Mir hat die ganze Reihe von Conjouring gefallen und ich kann sie wirklich weiterempfehlen! Die Filme sind spannend, hat seine lustigen Szenen und ist auch gruselig. Er hat alles, was ich erwartet habe, super erfüllt!

Horror movies lately have gone the way of parody films. No one knows how to properly do them anymore, and most don't even try. Compare old classic horror films like Nightmare on Elm Street or Friday the 13th to their respective reboots and you'll instantly notice that new horror film directors don't actually know what "horror" means and try to fill the screen time with gore, gratuitous nudity, silly jump scares and/or annoying shaky-cam.That's why I was pleasantly surprised by this film. Not only it avoids those pitfalls (it does have a few jump scares, but they're not cheap or unnecessary), it manages to actually tell a good story that can actually scare you. It might not make you jump from your seat or hide under the covers (it depends on what kind of person you are, really), but it will at the very least creep you out and leave you with an uneasy feeling several times.The first thing you want to do is ignore the "Based on a true story" sign. That's either purposefully misleading or an outright lie, for obvious reasons. Furthermore, it doesn't matter, since it doesn't add or take from your enjoyment of the story.The plot is, quite frankly, nothing new. A family moves to a secluded house in the woods and it turns out to be haunted, so they contact a somewhat famous paranormal-investigators couple to help them with their problem before they're driven insane. The plot bringing nothing new to the table isn't really a bad thing, since it's all about the execution.For starters, the movie counts with an amazing cast. No superfamous stars or silly Disney TV rejects here. Everyone, from the youngest to the oldest does a great job with their role. The visual style of the movie is also very appealing. The visuals on the movie and the make-up job are excellent, and the little CGI there is does a great job, and it's only used when necessary.Second, the characters here are well represented. While they're kind of a cliché (specially the family), they're actually interesting and likable people. They're cliché, but they're not one-note. This is very important, since it marks one of the reasons this movie is not like the awful horror films of later years: you actually care about these characters. For instance, the paranormal investigators are actually shown to be people who thoroughly investigate the cases to make sure there actually IS something paranormal occuring. Most movies will just claim these guys are always right and rational people are always wrong, but here, the couple recognizes that most cases of ghosts, spirits or haunting are actually tricks played on people by their own minds. This marks an important distinction, since in most "horror" films these days you hate the main characters so much that you end up rooting for the villain.Third, I can't state this enough: this movie is REALLY creepy. There are some parts that will give you goosebumps and make you see things that aren't there. The end shows up pictures of the actual people this film is based on. Those old-time pictures are usually quite creepy by themselves, more so here. There are small bits of the story that are left unexplained, which actually adds to the overall mysterious feel of the films, unlike other films, that leave you thinking "What the hell?" here the lack of specific details only adds to the film's appeal. I don't want to spoil anything, so I'll just say there are some times when the movie makes you think it's going to do one of those groan-inducing bad-horror-flick clichés, but it turns out to be something different.So, again, I think it's a pretty sweet film. As a last note, the quality of the Blu Ray picture and audio is great. I haven't checked the extras yet, so I don't know how good they are, but they seem to be a sizable chunk. If you have a Blu Ray player, that's the way to watch it.

Before I saw The Conjuring I heard a lot negative complaints that it was merely "cattle prod cinema" which I inferred meant a lot of awful stingers were the only thing that would make the audience jump. This horrible cliché has been overabundant in many so-called "horror" movies for a good while now and I my expectations were low.Thankfully, there are no stingers. Yes, there are scares and jumps, but the score is completely unobtrusive and there are no cats jumping out of closets or phones suddenly ringing. James Wan knows that atmosphere, cinematography, suggestion, and the unknown can build suspense and horror, and the Conjuring has plenty.Apparently based on a true story (which I am extremely doubtful of, but not completely disbelieving) a happy family of mom and dad and five young girls move into a large farmhouse bought at a low price from a bank auction. As soon as they cross the threshold things are not quite right and the property reeks of pure, menacing evil. Eventually they call in the help of a local ghost-hunting couple to document the case and research its history.It was the early 70s, the real Ghostbusters (pun intended) were still in college.About 80% of The Conjuring works. The dread, the suspense, and the inability to comprehend what is really lurking in the darkness of the house makes for great horror. The girls see...something, but we don't. It's a lot like Robert Wise's The Haunting, which is kind of ironic since Lily Taylor, who plays the mother, was in the 1999 remake of that movie, which was full of all the worst horror clichés and set-ups, as well as excessive CGI. It's like Taylor wanted to set the balance straight by doing a movie that took the opposite, and more intelligent, approach.John R. Leonetti's photography is very slick, with lots of slow, creeping shots, but I couldn't help but think that a rawer edge, with exploitation lighting, would have helped it look a bit more authentic. There are a bit too many slamming doors scares too, and towards the end it goes off on a completely pointless tangent with the Annabelle doll and does absolutely nothing with it. For the bulk of the running time The Conjuring seems original and groundbreaking, though in the last act it's a jumble of Blair Witch, The Exorcist, and What Lies Beneath.The positives still far outweigh the negatives, and I still recommend the film to horror fans. If only we had a version of The Amityville Horror that was made this way instead of that horrendous 2005 movie. No doubt there will be numerous sequels.The Blu-ray looks great in 2.40:1 1080p with brilliant DTS HD-MA sound. The extras could have been more satisfying.

.....war an dem Film, daß ich auf Spannung und Grusel wartete,ansonsten nichts.Ein 5-Sterne-Rezensent stellt zutreffend fest, daß der Film eigentlich nur aus Versatzstücken früherer Streifen bestehe, er zählt auch einige auf. Er finde den Film dennoch gelungen, weil der Regisseur diese hervorragend zu einem Schocker zusammengesetzt habe, wie es ihn seit Jahren nicht mehr gegeben habe. Empfindsamen rät er von dem Film ab. Eine für mich fundierte Rezension, was ich ihm auch per Kommentar mitgeteilt habe.Ein 2-Sterne- Rezensent übt ähnliche Kritik bezüglich der Versatzstücke und fehlendem Neuen, kommt aber zu gegenteiliger Beurteilung. Er empfinde den Regisseur uninspiriert, nicht zu vergleichen mit seinen früheren Regiearbeiten, die Darsteller agierten lustlos, manche Szenen wirkten einfach lächerlich. So sei es grotesk, an eine vom Dämonen besessenen Frau zu appellieren ,stark zu bleiben und an ihre Familie denken.Zumal:Im Filmwird auch von der für solche Phänomene sensiblen Frau des renommierten Forschers und später vom Vatikan noch nicht (sic!) autorisierten Laienexorzisten gespürt, daß viele Dämone unterschiedlicher Macht am Werke seien.Ich habe in der ersten halben Stunde weder Horror und Gänsehaut noch Erschreckendes erlebt. Schreckmomente kamen erst bei lautem Knall oder vergleichbarem Radau, aber eine in meiner Nähe abgefeuerte Schreckschußpistole wäre wirkungsvoller gewesen.Herrlich auch die Szene, in der Vera Farmiga durch ein Loch in der Wand oder eingekrachtem Boden oder Schacht hinter der entfernten Rückwand eines Schrankes purzelt(habe vergessen, was genau es war, ist aber auch ohne Belang). Der Göttergatte ruft nach ihr und klopft bei der Suche etliche Wände ab, ehe er auf die abstruse Idee kommt, im Keller zu suchen. Und, welche Überraschung, er findet sie dort! Und nach recht tiefem Fall unverletzt!Von den Schauspielern fand ich nur Vera Farmiga gut(und nebenbei sehr apart!), andere durchschnittlich, Veras Filmehemann regelrecht hölzern und untalentiert.Und als gegen Ende mehrere Vögel Amok fliegen, war der Unterschied zu einem Meisterwerk wie Hitchcocks "Die Vögel" wirklich krass .Ein Vogel gegen die Autoseitenscheibe, und schon fliegen die Scherben und Splitter, auch bei damals sicher nicht so stabilem Glas wie heute kaum glaubhaft. Bei Hitchcock sind es nur(zugegeben, verdammt viele)Vögel, aber die verbreiten schon nach kurzer Zeit mehr Horror als dieser Film insgesamt. Bei"Conjuring" gibt es nichts Subtiles, der Horror soll mit dem Vorschlaghammer erzeugt werden, nichts noch nicht Dagewesenes, einzige Überraschung das Auffinden der Farmiga im Keller, lebend. Aber auch nicht wirklich, ohne sie wäre eine Weiterführung der Handlung zwar möglich, aber doch zu traurig gewesen. Das geht doch nicht in einem Horrorfilm! Schließlich hat sie eine Tochter, die ebenfalls, vorbereitet durch Donner und Blitz, vom Dämonen angegriffen wird. Der wird ja immer stärker, da er seinen Opfern die Lebenskraft raubt, was sich unter Anderem in Hämatomen der Betroffenen manifestiert. Er hat auch die Stärke, die Hämatome, gleich welchen Alters, immer nur rot erscheinen zu lassen. Und daß sie in Form von vier parallelen Streifen quer über den Unterarm der bald besessenen Mutter von fünf Kindern nach Allem aussehen, nur nicht nach Abdrücken seiner fest zupackenden Hand, ist ein Beweis für seine gemeine Raffinesse.Offensichtlich gibt es ein Problem: eine Rezension ist immer auch ein Ausdruck des Geschmacks des Rezensenten, so banal das ist. Viele erwarten die Wahrheit und sind danach wütend auf ihn, bezichtigen ihn der Inkompetenz, Geschmacklosigkeit, des Analphabetismus oder des niedriegen IQs.Deshalb: Haut ihm sein Geschreibsel um die Löffel, im übertragenen Sinne!! Aber nur, wenn es platt, beleidigend, unbegründet und sachlich fehlerhaft ist.Ein kurzes "Top-Film, deshalb mehr als 5 Sterne." ist genauso unnütz für den Leser wie "Schund, übles Machwerk, kein Stern, wenn es möglich wäre."! Solche "Rezensionen" sollte man kommentieren, indem man den Verfasser auf die Nutzlosigkeit hinweist und ihn erinnert, was eine Rezension enthalten solle. Die Punkte einer Minimalanforderung werden von Amazon ja im Eingabefeld vorgeschlagen. Und, so lästig es auch ist, als nicht nützlich markieren!!!Unzufrieden bin ich, wie bei vielen DVDs oder Blu-rays, mit der nur mit Mühe und Lupe entzifferbaren kleinen Schrift auf der Rückseite vieler Hüllen, und das trotz erst kürzlich erfolgter Prüfung der Sehschärfe(um 90%)durch meinen Augenarzt und guter Gleitsichtbrille.Ein vorletzter Hinweis, besonders an Germanisten und/oder Sprachgewandte: Mir ist bewußt, daß bei einem 5-Sterne-Rezensenten sich die Sterne auf den Rezensenten und nicht auf die Rezension beziehen, die er verfaßt hat. Weitere Fehler sind unbeabsichtigt, wenn man vom weitgehenden Ignorieren der Rechtschreibreform absieht. Nützlicher Tip?Und zuletzt: Grusel wird bei unterschiedlichsten Bildern empfunden, bei mir löst die Erinnerung an Leute, die in einer Fersehshow in einem Glaskasten voller Maden ohne Handschuhe(wann tragen Insekten auch solche) nach einem Gegenstand wühlten, Unbehagen aus . In der Realität habe ich noch kurz lebende Menschen mit abgerissener Extremität sowie einen frischen Leichnam gesehen, nachdem sich der betreffende eine Schrotflinte in den Mund gesteckt hatte und Hirnschädel sowie Gehirn an umliegenden Wänden klebten. Mitgefühl? Ja!, aber kein Ekel. Hilfreich bei meinen Beruf, bei tränenden Augen, krankheits-und nicht emotionsbedingt, tränen meine allerdings mit.Doc Halliday