The New York Times Essential Library: Opera: A Critic's Guide to the 100 Most Important Works and the Best Recordings Paperback – November 1, 2004

I'm thrilled to have this book. I find Tommasini's recommendations right on the mark, and the synopses are just right. I am an Apple Music subscriber and have no problem finding the albums he recommends. He generally recommends two or more recordings for each opera. At the end there's a short list of 20 essential operas for new opera fans to get acquainted with. I have the Kindle edition on my iPhone and have been referring to this book more than to any other opera book I own.Highly recommend!

Stunning synopses of this otherwise stodgy and difficult-to-understand medium.. Tommasini shares generous insights that place you into the center of all opera -tragic and funny- and he pulls back the show curtain and knocks down the walls ...he lets us see behind the show curtain, places us the reader into the previously secret center. Opera is now unmasked and is available to every one in its full splendor. He genuinely wants us to enjoy opera and each of his anectodes-scholarly, familiar and humorous-show just how we all belong at the opera and that opera contains the story of our lives too. A lifetime of opera study presented in this easily digestible and night-stand worthy book.

You will find this very insightful book of great help to you especially if you are newer to the Opera world. I found that it gets you past the veneer and behind what is really going on. Highly recommended as an overall primer and for those who have been around. Also give you insight on the value of recordings and which ones are really helpful to listen to.

This book is good for someone who, like me, loves opera but is hesitant about trying something new. As the author says, it includes "most" of the warhorses, but there are certainly omissions: I Pagliacci and Cavalleria Rusticana, for instance. On the other hand, there is a generous selection of lesser-known operas for those who want to branch out.The essays on the operas differ in quality. Some are largely plot summaries, others point to particularly stirring passages, others are anecdotal. They do succeed, though, in making you want to hear the music. I followed the author's advice about Les Troyens, and was delighted to discover how much this lesser-known work appealed to me.As for the CD recommendations, the only fault I can find is that the author seems to have stopped buying recordings in about 1976; at least, very few recordings from after the seventies make his list. He's also heavily biased toward certain singers -- as he freely admits, at least in the case of Tebaldi.Naturally, anyone who knows opera and has some familiarity with various recordings will find much to dispute in the choices, but as one resource among several, this book can certainly be recommended.If you're looking for something more comprehensive, have a look at the Rough Guide to Opera.

I love the book and its age and condition was just what I expected from the description. I'm very happy with it.

i still haven't made my way through the entire book but i'm so excited to have it to look up operas when necessary!

Books of opera synopses bore me to tears. And I wasn't expecting much here. But indeed Anthony Tommasini, the principal music critic of the New York Times, has not written that sort of book at all. He assumes that most readers will have some notion of what each opera is about and he writes of them from that perspective, focusing more on musical and dramatic aspects of the opera. He recommends his favorite CD recordings of the operas - and makes a comment that DVDs are new enough that there aren't DVDs of some of the operas he is writing about - and makes a case for each of them. He starts by giving some explanatory notes about such things as voice types, bel canto and recitative, and includes a little essay about why he chose the operas to include in his 'top 100.' He clearly is interested in proselytizing for some lesser-known and some modern operas (e.g., Copland's 'Tender Land,' Prokofiev's 'Betrothal in a Monastery,' Messiaen's 'Saint François d'Assise') that he feels have been ignored to some degree. Some choices are both surprising and exciting, such as Sondheim's 'Sweeney Todd.' He includes little-known facts that were new even to a grizzled opera-lover like this reviewer. And best of all he writes in a elegant and unfailingly interesting style. I found myself having trouble putting the book down. I tended to like the book at least partly because his enthusiasms mirror mine, but in those areas where we disagree he argued his points cogently. For instance, I am willing, after reading his essay about John Adams's 'Nixon in China,' to investigate it further.Tommasini writes for both the relative newcomer to opera and the operatic veteran. There is a dearth of technical terms, but when one is used it is gracefully and uncondescendingly defined. This is a book for the reader whose interest in opera is anything more than cursory.Scott Morrison

This is a fun book for both opera lovers and record collectors. I may disagree with some selections, but all in all sound advice, especially for the beginning collector. There are some major operas that are excluded, e.g., Gounod's Faust, and there are some new recordings of operas that should have been included, e.g., Decca's new recording of Massanet's Thais. But a fun book nevertheless.Ross Scimeca