The Brothers Karamazov (Dover Thrift Editions: Classic Novels)

One hardly needs to praise this acclaimed novel. But after my third reading I am in awe. The novel works in two entirely different ways, which are nevertheless intertwined. On one hand it is a great story. On the other hand it is a profound meditation. (Interestingly I recently watched two film versions -- the American/Hollywood (1958) and the Russian (1969) -- that divide on just this point. Both are excellent movies, I feel, but the American one works strictly as a great romance and crime drama, while the Russian one is truer to the philosophical concerns.)The reason Dostoevsky had for writing this novel, besides his continual need to support himself and his family, and his passion for writing, was to convey the idea that (what he considered) the innate faith of the Russian people in God, immortality, and Christ is essential to living morally. (In “real life” Dostoevsky was fanatical about this, to the point of viewing Russian Orthodoxy – the tsar included -- as key to the salvation of the whole world. He might very well have been a Putin supporter, despite his otherwise agapic and socialist leanings.)This idea is embodied by Alyosha Karamazov, one of the brothers and a Christ-like figure of universal loving, and also his spiritual mentor, Father Zosima. The idea is also embodied in the brother Ivan (and his own acolyte, the brother Smerdyakov), albeit in its negative manifestation, since he accepts the implication – that without God, everything is permissible, including crime – but, opposite to Alyosha, rejects God.The fourth brother, Dmitri, embodies the idea as well, but in his case – perhaps the most typically human -- God “wins” but always with a struggle. With Alyosha godliness is simply natural. Ivan also struggles, but in him God’s victory is only intermittent because Ivan’s reason and compassion find the evil in the world to be in absolute conflict with the conception of a good and all-powerful God. (Smerdyakov is the extreme God-rejector, Alyosha’s pure opposite.) Thus faith alone (and even contrary to reason), as Alyosha possesses with passion (but also Dmitri, if only by Russian instinct), could give God a clear victory.Dostoevsky does not shy away from this implication. That is one thing that makes this novel great: It challenges the believer so effectively that many readers will side with Ivan’s impassioned argument for atheism. And also for this reason, the story (and character) aspect of the novel is crucial; indeed, Dostoevsky believed that it was the answer to Ivan’s argument, which otherwise could not be defeated by rational argument.The reader will have to judge how successfully the events and characters of the novel refute atheism. I myself think that Dostoevsky’s position doesn’t make sense even in its own terms. Consider that for everything to be “permitted,” there would still need to be an authority that permits; but if God does not exist, who would there be to permit anything? So crime would not be permitted, no more than it would be prohibited if there were no God (according to the theodic logic).Be that as it may, the story and characters stand on their own merits, it seems to me. And here again the novel is a great one. As an aspiring novelist myself, I am in awe of the many amazing personalities and ingenious intricacies of plot that Dostoevsky introduces in this mammoth book. How he was able to maintain the cohesion despite facing publishing deadlines for installments, usual for his day, is beyond my comprehension. (He failed to do this in previous novels. This one was his greatest and final triumph. He died shortly after completion … with a second volume tantalizingly forming in his mind.)

Amazing novel no need to comment on Dostoevsky. Happy to have it for the first time. A reference of measure for all other novels I read I’m afraid.I’m grateful for the Kindle/Audible combined with the same paper text for this work. Much easier to mark sections on kindle and go back to text for review.

What the hell kind of ending was that?!Dostoyevsky, I love you, I really do...and I loved The Brothers Karamazov; but the ending, the ending...how depressing.I expected so much more. The story was interesting; yes, it was long winded at times, but it was very interesting. I thought I would read about Mitya's escape from prison. Or, read about how he was actually guilty...or actually not guilty. Instead, I read about a poor elementary school boys passing.Dostoyevsky. I understand that this was your last novel. Your "swan song" so to speak, and i understand that you were facing your mortality so the novel was very philisophilical, but to end it like that. With PANCAKES! PANCAKES, DOSTOYEVSKY! PANCAKES!My dear, Dostoyevsky. I do not want to break up with you over an ending of a book. I implore you, if I ever meet you in the heavens, to tell me if Mitya was actually the murderer of his father or not. But, I guess, that is what you want. To leave your readers hanging by a thread FOREVER. What power you must have. How you must be laughing at all of us!Just you wait! I will seek you out in the heavens and ask you all my questions. You are not free!

Fyodor is an awesome author. I love his books.

I have several editions/translations of this book, and this Kindle edition -- while it contains a few errors of the kind that are typical to ebook conversion -- is very good. The biography portion of the ebook is especially fraught with spelling/grammar errors, but that seems to be because of translation problems, not automatic conversion issues. To me it seems like a novice translator did the work on the biography information, and there are some problems with phrases and spelling. Still, not a huge deal at all.If you've never Dostoevsky, this Kindle version is a great place to start. The annotations are helpful and the Kindle dictionaries are handy for looking up arcane words and information about Russian cities.Like Crime and Punishment and The Idiot, The Brothers Karamazov is a mesmerizing read. There's a wealth of weighty issues covered here -- topics from family, Christian faith, free will, and accountability, to the rise of socialism, nihilism, and atheism, all movements that were exploding in Russia at the time Dostoevsky wrote Brothers. You get a real sense of the social landscape in Russia at the time; you can feel the early winds of the Russian Revolution starting to blow, although it was still more than 30 years away.If you're worried about the subject matter, the length of the book, or the translation, allow me to offer this: jump into this novel feet first. It'll take you a while to finish the book and you'll probably have to work a little harder than you have on most anything else you've read. But it's worth the effort.Dostoevsky was a brilliant storyteller and this is his greatest story. I honestly consider my life to be richer for having read this novel.

Dostoevsky reveals all that is good and all that is evil in man through the Karamazov brothers. Love and tragedy, hope and punishment, life and death the gamut of emotions drive you forward to the bitter end and leave you wanting more, but satisfied knowing you have shared this time with one of the greatest story tellers of all time.

Unbeatable price, a masterpiece of lirerature & story telling

Awesome book. Go for it.

Starts well but after a few pages the translation goes downhill, unintelligible

I love Dostoyevsky. This is a wonderful and tragic tale of three brothers. But it's so much more. With an epic cast of loveable and believable characters, romance, melodrama, and a unsolved mystery to boot, The Brothers Karamazov is a literary triumph. I dropped it to four stars because the author rambled in places, getting carried away with himself, and I still prefer Crime and Punishment.I love to, and appreciate Dostoyevsky's skill at presenting both sides of moral and ethical issues with equal clarity and objectivity.

This is not really a book, it is a launch into the universe. I have read it several times and each time it seems a completely new story. A proper study of The Brothers Karamazov could be a lifetime's dedication. I am a novelist myself and have taught Creative Writing extensively.The depth of Dostoyevsky's exploration of character could not be plumbed by many, least of all by myself, but it has made me happy just to realise that someone could do it and because it is there it is possible. When I finished the Kindle version on this reading I actually bought the hard copy here under discussion so that I could read it again and make better notes. It is Constance Garnett's translation that has given me the book back after I have read several others. A Russian friend of mine recommended it, this after I had been told it was not the most accurate. It is accurate in the sense that it conveys to the English-speaking reader what the writer intended (I know some Russian). I know I am writing awful superlatives but it was an experience to read this, not a pastime. If I have one criticism of this edition it is that a better and fuller introduction could be added to the translator's own sketchy one, and something scholarly would be a help,