1000 CD/DVD Labels Matte Neato 2 UP Compatible

Well, the shipper has offered me a refund because of my problem, but only if I remove the below negative feedback. Does this mean their "image" on Amazon is more important that customer satisfaction? Wonder what Amazon would say? Discuss!!!I took a chance and ordered these based on their significantly better pricing than Neato's, and even though my order arrived in far less that pristine shape (c/o poor packing and USPS) with less than 1/2 of the sheets being useable, I suppose to that end I came out ahead for the money (???). The (remaining) sheets run in my printer [Epson inkjet] with no feed problems at all, weed easily and cleanly without alot of curling (unlike Neato's), and apply smoothly, flat and seemingly well bonded; though too soon to tell if they stay that way over time. THE REAL DRAWBACK to these sheets is that the paper is significantly softer and more pourous, which has created some "less than satisfying" results in color renditions of the art/graphics being printed on them. The higher absorption of the CMYK inks, particularly Magenta, has resulted in my spending significant time adjusting color balances/percentages (and running multiple test prints = ink+label costs) to get the color values to print, as designed, on these labels. Granted, this isn't a real problem if you're not particularly concerned with this issue, but for me, the time/labor involved in compensating for it has well outweighed the $$$ savings of the (useable) labels themselves. In the future, if I need quality prints, I'll spend the money to get the labels to get them; when I don't, I'll buy more of these.

Are these as good as the Fellows "NEATO" brand? These low-priced labels ARE better PRICED, but as far as handling in my printer (H/P) and color reproduction, they may be a bit wanting. After running several (hundreds) through my printer, I've found that many of the sheets don't feed correctly, ending up with my spending MORE $$$$ (than less) on each printed label. What they call "premium" paper might be somewhat questionable, too. Maybe that's some of the problem with the paper-feeding headaches - I dunno. Each sheet seems to be "limp" as compared to the Fellows brand.Another gripe is the fact that you need to examine the sheets VERY carefully before putting them into your printer. How many times I have ended up wasting ink and printed on the BACKS of these instead of on the removable adhesive label side! There is absolutely no text/instructions - on either side - to let you know which side is the "printable side." The picture for this product shows definite lines showing where the pre-cut labels are located on the sheet. Believe me, they're not that visible in real life! (Almost INvisible, in fact)After trying these, I'll probably go back to ordering the genuine Fellows "NEATO" labels. 'Too much waste to really call it a bargain.But, then again, maybe it's my printer. You be the judge.

This is a match for the NEATO Fellows 2-CD labels. These labels are just a hairline smaller by circumference than the stock Fellows ones. So unless you're using letters to the very edges it shouldn't matter. The labels are thinner than Fellows. And there's no ink markings to easily see where the labels are on the page (like the Fellows). That being said, THEY WORK. And whereas Fellows wants to charge close to 50-cents a label, these should only cost you around 5-cents....BIG DIFFERENCE. I would give these 5-stars if the selling company double boxed them. The postal service tends to damage the corners which make it difficult to feed into the printer. Other than that...these are a great find.

The first time I purchased these Labels the Big hole was perferated, I purchased these a second time becouse I liked the full disc coverage but the big hole is no longer perforated and separates as easily as the small hole. It is very difficult to get the picture lined up when the big hole separates, if I wanted big hole labels I could have purchased them cheaper elsewhere!

Great labels for the money, very close to the neato fellowes labels, if you do mass labeling I recommend these labels, using an HP photosmart and they work great with it.

The labels are very thin!! This causes them to curl when removed from backing paper. When using a "cd stomper" they don't lay flat on it. This causes a major issue when applying the label to the cd.

These labels came in two packages wrapped well in plastic & packed into a sturdy cardboard shipping carton inside ANOTHER carton. They arrived in pristine condition. Label pages have no printing on them at all, just the standard scores that Neato CD label pages have had since I started using them several years ago. My existing Neato template for printing CD/DVD labels worked beautifully, first time, every time. Price AND product are excellent. I am very pleased with this purchase and appreciative of solid standardization of this product so there is no need to hunt around for a printing template or create a new one. And I especially like that there is no printing on the labels at all as this allows complete freedom of design.

I bought these assuming they would be of mediocre quality, but as others have stated, they are excellent. I've used the original Neato brand 2UP labels before, and these are easily just as good. They are also 100% compatible -- I used the template on Neato's website and everything lined up just fine. They're not too thick, so they run through the manual feed tray of my HP Laserjet 4200n without incident, and the feed rollers are able to pull them in without grabbing multiple sheets.I'd buy these again, but at 1000 to a pack, it will be a while before I need more.